Thanks. Now I have Elmer Bernsteinās main title theme playing in my head.
A good Western shoot 'em up with a great cast.
Itās awesome. One of my favorites.
But if you knew how food was āmadeā you might not make unreasonable demands of its āmakers.ā
Preach it! The way they treat those poor s is just awful!
Funny guys. Making me play the straight man.
Just deserts.
Youāre the one who said the safety was on! Youāre welcome to disable it at any time, just be careful where you point that thing.
Not to mention, The Good, the Bad and the Ugly, the best Spaghetti Western ever made!
This encompasses business, technology and Wyze products:
Would it benefit all Wyze customers to āgrokā that? Or would Wyze prefer they not?
Someone within the last three or four days was politely moaning in a thread about Wyze not better informing their customers about product limitations. Looked briefly but couldnāt locate it.
This?
Thanks!
Omission is among ābest practicesā in business today. If Wyzeā typical customer truly owns only one or two cams as @carverofchoice contends, why would Wyze or itās formal or informal support personnel not volunteer that when relevant to a customerās complaint ā about the 3.0 app being best suited to people with few devices, for instance?
Instead, you get these pointless threads with people grousing at each otherās red rumps, with relatively little learned or resolved.
Plausible deniability?
Seems plausible.
That is very good point, maybe thatās why Wyze designed the favourites tab to simultaneously stream active cams. It does seam to choke if there are more than two cameras.
In my experience, there are few things more destructive to āfriendlyā relations (a Wyze principle) than omission.
It conveys a deep disrespect.
Iāve reached my āmaximum edits per dayā so Iām AFK for now. Cheers, all, talk amongst yourselves.
Same here, wife just announced that dinner is ready. Talk to you guys in the morrow!