No, when I think about it I would have to ask “Why would I bother?”. Are you really advocating changing out a core component of my network to find a compatible router for a consumer level device like a Wyze Thermostat? Wyze in no way publishes a list of “approved devices” or why one device would work better than another. There are articles deeper in their support and blogging areas which provide some insights on very specific routers like ASUS and others with very specific features to enable/disable to fix apparently known issues with those specific routers.
However, you have to really search for those solutions. When you do find those solutions and look very carefully at them they are not really router specific they discuss what could be considered common protocol options. Options which should be included in core documentation.
I think those options are not included in the core documentation because it would be confusing and could potentially scare off the average consumer who would not know how to modify their router configuration.
In the end I have well over 100 different different devices( IoT, virtual machines, Laptops/PC’s, SAN storage, streaming devices [Chrome Cast, Roku, etc.], terminal appliances ) none of which have any issue with the way my network has been designed. I work professionally as a network / cloud architect and can tell you that I both personally and professional follow fairly standard networking practices/standards.
Is it really on my head to have to go out and “find” a router which somehow works with all of my Wyze devices? I could be at that a very long time if I go out and just guess and buy different routers hoping that some stock consumer router hopefully/magically fills the need. The other attack at this is to lower my security settings or place all of my Wyze devices in a VLAN which is outside the control on my NAT. However that would open those devices to every jackass who plays hacker on the internet. That’s all I need is to have my house go to 120 degrees in the middle of the night or for someone to spy on me using my own cameras.
No, I think Wyze has two paths here. The first is to use their newly released mesh router as the approved standard for all of their WIFI devices. I mean really work out the kinks on that device and make it the baseline for all of their devices. Then say if you want 100% no problem buy the Wyze router and use Wyze devices on the Wyze router. To date they have not even done that as there are all sorts of issues using their own devices on their mesh router (plus there are a lot of issue with the router itself at the moment).
I would happy add the Wyze mesh router to my network if Wyze would stand behind it as a totally compatible out of the box solution for all of their WIFI devices. If you were to ask my opinion, it is a bit of an embarrassment that it has not yet happened.
The other approach would be to again use the newly released Wyze mesh router as the baseline. Build a set of standards to compare the consumer level router vertical leaders stock configurations against. Mapping the Wyze router protocol features against the likes of Cisco, ASUS, Netgear, TPLink would at least give you a starting point to note what was different. If for no other reason than to know what is available and is working on the Wyze mesh router and what may be different on the device you are working with. At least that would give you the knowledge of where to possibly start and what may be causing an issue.
I suppose I envision the Wyze testing lab something using an old Linksys BEFW11S4 (circa 1999) using a 2.4 GHz wireless band with a 802.11B / WEP wireless standard (as many of Wyze’s devices still only work correctly against 2.4GHz spectrum). The router is probably on top of a microwave oven which is above a garage and is being tested with a guy with a plate in his skull. Every time someone nukes a bean burrito the WIFI signal is blown out, the guy wets his pants and the garage door opens.
In all seriousness I really do not think it is incumbent on the consumer to guess at what the right router to use with Wyze devices. Nor do I think it should require the purchase of a specific router. It is all networking after all and everything should be resolvable via configuration. To resolve these issues all that would required is decent documentation and a published standard for people to work against. That and perhaps Wyze making their QA/UAT process a little deeper than: "Does the Wyze device get an IP address when connected to a circa 1999 Linksys wireless router in a DMZ.
In the immortal words of Chris Carter (formerly of the Minnesota Vikings) “Come On Man!”