Said Objection Overruled. No signs were posted in the vicinity of the dinning area. 
I think the chickens had a flight scheduled to CA and now you ruined their plans, they miss their Mom.
3 Likes
I have only feeble, legal intuition, Ann, but I say stick with ‘location’. Conspicuous by its absence 'til now. 
2 Likes
Time to get the bb gun
1 Like
Or tinfoil…
2 Likes
That big boy is allowed to join the Jury FOR my client. The bigger, the better.
My client would like to point out that property ownership is complicated. Owning a title does not give one unlimited rights to that property. For example, a landowner with a house on it typically does not own the “mineral rights” to their own land, and so most property is actually technically a “split estate” rather than a “unified estate” wherein a title holder also owns the mineral rights.
My client says that since you do not own a cat of your own, he is legally entitled to claim the pet territory rights in that entire area. As a human, you do not possess the territory ownership over your “surface” rights just as you likely don’t own the mineral rights. If you had your own cat or dog who enforced that area as their territory, then my client may have been trespassing under the law of nature section Meow, subsection Hiss, but since there is no other rightful territory claim to that area, my client has a right to be there per law of nature section Meow subsection Purr. Since there is not currently a territory dispute, my client would like to ask you to stay in your lane. and respect the law. He can’t possibly be trespassing in his own claimed territory. It’s impossible.
In addition, my client would simply counter-sue for discrimination. He has been employed to relocate rodents and pests from his surrounding territory, which includes flying rodents who are stealing things intentionally put out by humans. My client perceives this as a form of employment discrimination, which he is prepared to sue over.
1 Like