Interwebs atwitter! 
After something @dave27 said elsewhere. Wasn’t room in that thread for the both of us. 
I thought it was a perfectly good analogy. But apparently I offended an angry ex 
I have no idea what is being talked about here, but an AI tells me it means that a "former Twitter executive cut ties with someone that was a former [title/relationship to them in some way]. 
Sooooo…I’m still lost, but not sure I want to understand in this case anyway if it involves someone being offended. I’m not a super huge fan of conflict and contention.
2 Likes
The party of the first part and the party of the second part are both thick-skinned and good-natured and enjoy a little contestation.
The party of the third part is also a & b but did not participate in c so was having a little fun after the fact. 