I have several Reolink cameras integrated with Home Assistant, and they’re much faster and more reliable than Wyze using the API or RTSP.
This is long but important (representation of the community sentiment)
The most frustrating part about this certificate breakdown, and the broader, years-long lack of official Home Assistant support, is (as a business owner and business consultant myself) watching a classic business blind spot play out in real time.
When Wyze leadership looks at metrics, they see the Home Assistant and self-hosted hobbyist crowd as a tiny, possibly single-digit or low double digit percentage of their total user base. From a pure spreadsheet perspective, it’s easy for them to justify prioritizing features for the “mass market” user who only owns one or a couple app-connected cameras.
But that logic completely misses the concept of the Force Multiplier User.
Hobbyists, power users, and Home Assistant coordinators are the most influential segment of the smart home market. We are the tech support for our families, the neighborhood consultants, and the content creators making the very comparison videos that prospective buyers watch before clicking “Add to Cart.”
Most people here know that I have obviously been one of Wyze’s biggest champions. I’m a volunteer here, and my own home is practically a showroom for almost every device Wyze has ever manufactured. Hundreds of them. It used to be that when people visited, saw my setup (which includes really cool automations including fully automated lighting inside my house and other such things with Wyze as my PRIMARY ecosystem), and asked for advice on building out their own smart homes, 90% of them would walk away choosing Wyze.
Today? That number has flipped, despite my huge influence of what I do personally (Wyze is still my primary with hundreds of devices which should make an impact on persuading them, but fewer and fewer walk away deciding it is the best option for them now).
Now, when friends, family, or clients ask for recommendations, I have to be candid about the long-term roadmap. If they want to expand their ecosystem down the road, Or be able to do advanced automations, Wyze simply doesn’t scale with them with what they are planning:
- Ecosystem Gaps: Wyze doesn’t offer core hardware pieces like dedicated smart buttons, leaving huge blind spots if you try to stay entirely in-network. They have too many smart home gaps to be your primary or only ecosystem for a smart home. They did this to themselves starting in 2023 When they decided they were going to deprioritize any smart home expansion and focus solely on cameras. This made it impossible for a lot of people to be able to consider them as their primary smart home platform.
- Automation Limitations: The native rules engine lacks basic conditional logic (IF/AND/OR/NOT) or wait states, not to mention sequential execution of actions, and other basic things
- Lack of Interoperability: No official Home Assistant integration, no native RTSP (technically now limited RTSP to a couple devices), and no local control options (everything is cloud dependent instead of cloud enhanced). Most of their primary like-kind competitors support all of these things and it’s killing them.
- Once people realize they can’t tie their ecosystem together, close to 90% of them choose a competitor like Reolink or others right out of the gate even if they don’t need interoperability right now.
Some people still leave my house and decide Wyze is perfect for what they intend, but 90% decide it has a lot of gaps that will cause larger issues with their goals in the long term compared to other options, even though I personally choose Wyze for my primary. It’s killing them.
Look through the comments just in this thread or the home assistant wishlist thread and the related ones. Long-time, loyal customers, including many who actually pay for Cam Plus subscriptions are actively auditing their setups, canceling services, and replacing their hardware because they need reliability and local interoperability.
It really frustrates me knowing that when Wyze execs see subscription churn or sales dips, they will likely attribute it to macroeconomic factors or broad market shifts. They won’t see the silent drain: the thousands of potential new customers who never bought a single Wyze camera because the advanced user they sought advice from steered them away, Or simply asked them “if” questions about their medium to long-term goals and they decided for themselves that it was smarter to do something else.
Treating the advanced community as a “niche hobby” is actively killing referrals and damaging brand reputation among the very people who built the foundation of Wyze’s word-of-mouth growth. Fixing the certificate issue is a temporary band-aid. Providing stable, open connection points like an official Home Assistant integration is how Wyze stops the bleeding.
And it wouldn’t hurt to start expanding their smart home so there are fewer ecosystem gaps that force people to go to competitors to fill those gaps, which only leads their customers to absolutely need interoperability, which then leads them to realize they can’t meet their needs with Wyze. I understand why they decided they wanted to drop product expansion from everything but cameras, but when that is applied with their other policy situation, together, it’s killing them and driving The most influential people away.
This post is fairly representative to what I’m explaining here:
@raym64 posted some similar explanations and clarifications about this in another thread as well
Here is a very long time loyal customer and respectful forum user with several Wyze devices who even pays subscriptions to Wyze who says I don’t even use home assistant that much except for a few critical scripts and automations that Wyze just doesn’t support [natively] themselves So they had to look elsewhere for a workaround to get that to work for them and to meet their needs even though they don’t really use home assistant or other stuff. But Wyze not only doesn’t support them being able to do the automations they need to do with their Wyze devices, but when they found a workaround solution to be able to do it, now Wyze is breaking that for them too. He may end up having no alternative but to consider giving up and cancelling the subscription and moving on to something that won’t be such a fight To get their devices to just do what he wants them to do. (Thanks for your comment @raym64 I’ve always enjoyed our interactions over the years. You’re an awesome guy I highly respect)
This is the thing I’ve been trying to get them to understand for the last few years. They’re shooting themselves in the foot and blaming it on other metrics or macroeconomic variables or something with a big blind spot on what’s actually going on, or at the very least the kind of reality they could have if they were open to listen to their most influential users and expanded the vision a little bit.
I watch a lot of comparison videos for cameras and other things, and I can’t count how many I have recently seen emphatically tell people that they should probably avoid Wyze due to limited home assistant support, which they are almost definitely going to want or need as they expand to fill in the gaps (hardware, automation, and feature gaps).
Fixing the certificate issue should be a minimum level of effort IMO, particularly for a company who has made a ton of effort in the last 2 years to correct their public perception on taking security seriously. It is not a good look to continue using a deprecated certificate that the industry as a whole has declared (with lots of advanced warning) to no longer meet the minimum standards.
I wish there was an easier way to help the execs understand how their decisions are affecting the overall KPIs that they are focused on, But aren’t measuring some things that are critically important and influential to those stats. It affects all of them, new sales funnels, retention, even subscriptions, etc (at the very least fewer people joining Wyze in favor of competitors, some of whom would have signed up for the Wyze subscriptions, and MANY people are actively steered away from Wyze even though Wyze PERFECTLY matches their use-case for what they want and what they would use if for…Wyze would be perfect for LOTS of people, but they watch an influencer or talk to a hobbiest neighbor or family member who convinces them to go elsewhere even though Wyze would be perfect for the newbie who doesn’t need the advanced stuff simply because Wyze isn’t fitting for the advanced influential person who is trying to expand and grow).
I have tried to share this type of analysis with Wyze employees to represent the community to the best that I can on behalf of all of you, but I don’t think my points [on this particular topic] are taken As seriously as they merit. However, I will keep trying. And I will keep relaying things on behalf of community members to the best I am able. Know that I am supportive. It does help to have other people give their own voice on these things that I can actually reference instead of it being easy to dismiss things as me speaking solely on behalf of myself. So, thank you to everybody who does share their voice [respectfully] on this matter. It is helpful, at the very least to give me the ability to reference that there are a number of other people posting these things themselves about how it is affecting them and why they should honestly consider things without relying on my voice alone.
It can be helpful. For example, the only reason Wyze finally ended up doing dark mode or started working on rtsp on some cameras, is because so many people were giving their voice on how much they wanted these things and how important they were, so they finally started prioritizing them… At least until people stop talking about them, and then they seemed to slow down a lot when it seemed like the engagement on those issues began to wane (To be fair, they are still working on rtsp and just announced that rtsp for the V4 should be released by the end of the month). So yes, engagement on certain topics and sharing your voice does make a difference for important things to not be easily dismissed as small edge case matters.
Hopefully some of the higher ups take the time to read this and some of your respectful feedback. I will try to keep doing what I can to support these efforts with the limited extra access I have available. 
Another loyal wyze user about to pull the plug and move on if these problems are not addressed
I’ve mostly given up on Wyze. Have some cameras (V2, V3, V1 & V2 Pan Cams) some bulbs, routers and one or two motion sensors. I no longer purchase anything Wyze. I use CamPlus Lite for the cameras and have no intention to use any of the other subscriptions. Mostly I use YoLink, z-wave, zigbee and TP-Link devices now. I only use the Wyze products I have because I’m not ready to spend the money needed to replace them. They work for my needs but, if they fail, I’ll purchase a different brand.
I was a big fan of Wyze, initially. Now I find other products work better, integrate with Home Assistant and are much less frustrating to use.
Official support kind of a lose term.
Its more like it kind of works kind of doesn’t and they don’t actually do any support for it.
Excellent reply and writeup! I’ve followed you on here for years and you always seem to put into words what I’m trying to get across.
You make a very good point about the downstream users or potential users in the orbits of hobbyists or power users. I don’t consider myself an expert by any means, but I have probably recommended, advised, or even helped set up smart devices for more people in my orbit than I can even remember over the years. For quite a while, lots of those recommendations were for Wyze devices. The majority of those users didn’t want or need a HA setup, at least initially, but once they had some devices, they often want to do more with them.
I’ve also noticed an increased revolt against anything with subscriptions needed from those asking me about devices, more so than previously.
Not long ago, a relative asked me for help getting clips with their Wyze camera. It was a version 3 that I had reset and given them a while back from my spares collection. They don’t have, nor want any subscriptions. When I went to help, I was actually surprised how hobbled the camera was since I’ve had Cam Unlimited pretty much since it was available and I’m used to having it. I could see why the frustration.
For Home Assistant, once I got into that, it’s now a requirement for me to be supported with any new or replacement devices. The only things I do with Wyze in HA are automations and scripts to arm and disarm Wyze Home Monitoring, and lock my doors. Anything else is more trouble than it’s worth for me in HA with my Wyze products. Of course, those scripts broke with the recent Cert issue before I rolled back HA. I’m likely going to apply the cert workaround for now; I just haven’t gotten to it yet.
Even though the limit of what I could do with Wyze in HA wasn’t ideal, I was mostly satisfied to keep going, at least for a while as is. This latest problem will likely push me to change out more devices for something else. I’ve already eliminated all Wyze bulbs, plugs, thermostats, and most sensors. I’m down to just the cameras, home monitoring system, and the original locks. Oh, and I have the Wyze Scale to.
If I do switch out most of the rest, I’ll probably stick around here
and keep the half dozen cameras that are only used like baby monitors for my wife’s licensed home daycare. Those don’t need services, or even recording, just viewing.
It really seems shortsighted to me that something like Home Assistant support, (which shouldn’t be that difficult) seems to be such a problem for them. If they think it’s a small user base, then they shouldn’t be worried about cutting deeply into their bottom line. Especially if it opens up a bunch more customers and all the people those users recommend devices to.
Sadly i seen this before where company’s are more interested in make money now and don’t see how they end up killing their own business in the process.
Frankly given their actions and behavior i am guessing there going to try and lock the whole thing down behind their paywalls.
the cert issue is killing my smarthome, and i am about to start replacing everything starting on the bulbs..
I am gonna start this post with, I agree with everything my friend @carverofchoice has said in this post and I’ll try not to just repeat everything he has said.
Home Assistant/whatever… is “niche” compared to the average customer going to the store and picking up a Wyze product.
Now, for me, I am even further into the niche category for what I use Wyze for. As someone who lives pretty rural, I don’t have the same expectations as many customers do in their products. Thankfully it is very safe where I am so my use case is general monitoring and well being of the farm. I use cameras to watch over cattle, chickens, my dog, fields, water well’s, you name it. I have over 140 cameras active on just my home network, and that is just purely cameras, not general IoT devices.
Wyze has really shifted their mindset to cameras and camera stability and whatnot and I LOVE that personally, I want them to make sure their core product is robust. The problem here now is, everything else has suffered. There have been almost no changes or even firmware updates to the existing lineup. For example, the air purifier which I i adore, has the worst connectivity performance that has been unaddressed for quite sometime now. Why is this not a maintained product anymore?
Except for cameras, scales, etc.. almost most of the product line is severely out of date in terms of feature sets like power monitoring on smart plugs which I have had to move to a different vendor for in my transition to a fully smart farm.
Where I am going with this is… Home Assistant is the brain behind the smart farm. Almost every product I buy has home assistant integration that is official and maintained actively by the company themselves. Wyze’s biggest competitors are absolutely killing it in that space and that pains me to say as one of Wyze’s biggest fans. The argument or fear of revenue loss is understandable but not really fair anymore. I would argue you are losing money in the hardware space on non recurring revenue devices because of the lack of attention or care to those devices and lack of hardware upgrades to them. If a smart plug doesn’t have power monitoring built in or a light bulb, I do not purchase them because they cannot track what I need them to ultimately track.
I could go on all day about how my entire system is built and evolving all the time but I don’t want to take up anymore of your time.
If there is one thing I could say it would be, Wyze, make your product good enough where people want to buy the subscription/hardware regardless if they have it locally integrated into their own systems.
Please know I love this company and their values and their dedication to customers and I want Wyze to be around for a long time. Continuing to “ignore” or act like home assistant or whatever it may be doesn’t exist, will hurt the company as time goes on. Please consider changing your mind. Thanks!
Thanks Buddy.
For those in the forums who don’t recognize cyberdog_17 around here as much, he’s one of Wyze’s primary mods on Facebook and discord. 
But we’re always happy to see him stopping over here to engage in the forums too even if he doesn’t have an official volunteer flair here.
Cyberdog, You have one of the largest Wyze camera networks I know of, and did an awesome job integrating them all (and other devices) with advanced workarounds through home assistant. It’s always been impressive. Thanks for tagging in Jason and Dave to the thread too. It will be good for their attention to be drawn to this thread. The certificate fix should be pretty simple to resolve at the very least.
I am hoping i am wrong but given their actions i suspect the odds are they are planing on locking things down.
They lied about the security breaches and kept them hidden for years then dropped api twice supposedly for security but just happened to happen when things went behind paywalls.
These are not the actions of a company that cares about the buyer but rather one about the bottom line.
Given the cert not being updated would affect paying customers there every reason to get it done quickly to make sure there no payment interruptions.
The utter lack of any input from wyze itself even thought hey are aware the cert is not a good sign.
@magnusman60 I’ve become a vocal critic of Wyze, but I do recognize they are a business. I think they should be profitable, even very profitable. I would imagine Wyze & many other companies out there are leary of things like Home Assistant for a few reasons. One being it’s a small nieche that might require more work/support, local-first control might hurt a business model that have thin margins on hardware in hopes of making up in subscriptions, open standards might mean less lock-in of customers & more competition, etc. However, as I’ve said elsewhere, homes would not be functional if we had closed standards where you needed a proprietary door knob for your door, brand specific light switch with matching hub, etc. This has lead to lots of ewaste, tech graveyards, etc. While I get that IoT has additional layera of complication, I don’t think companies considered this & Home Assistant, Zigbee, Matter, etc. show it’s a MUST.
Personally, I like Zigbee for sensors, because they are standards based that can’t connect to the internet, which provides a security layer & local control. In terms of cameras, I’m at a point where I DON’T want cameras connected to the internet, but a local hub. That hub allows my cameras to function locally regardless of internet or if the company still exists. Additionally, it’s a layer of security where primarily the hub needs security updates or firewall rules. Wyze has been great for ease of use & low bar of entry, but for real home security they are sadly a child’s toy. 
I would happily pay for a Wyze hub & subscription that turned off internet access & all cameras could only communicate with this hub, which Wyze charged me a subscription for ease of access on my phone.
Wyze can meet in the middle with RTSP, but it’s been 8 months & we’ve seen maybe 3 cams support (after a years ago failed attempt) & if Wyze hasn’t supported Home Assistant since requested in 2018 on a wish list, they aren’t about to start. Sadly they will become e-waste as I transition to Reolink. My home requires my local control, & Wyze will NOT provide that.
@WyzeDave You could have your cake & eat it too. Give the noisy nieche users local-first control that plays nice with Home Assistant & lock it behind a premium pay wall. I think you & the Wyze team team have amazing products & deserve to make a generous profit. However, our Homes are not to be corporate owned & in the age of down servers & security hacks, we need an industry pivot. Help give us our e-homes back!
You make some good points.
These are definitely some of the primary concerns. There are still ways to give extra value from the subscriptions though. For example, some people already mentioned using their Wyze HMS subscription features in home assistant to do advanced script automations and involve other devices not normally integrated into HMS. Wyze could also add the extra AI detections from their Cam Unlimited as entities in Home Assistant that allow people to use them as triggers. With Cam Unlimited Pro they could allow descriptive notifications and other features to go through home assistant for lots of cool options. I guarantee lots of people would be really excited for many of these things even if some of them were only available through their subscriptions as evidenced by the fact that lots of people love using paid HMS in home assistant (including myself, and several others I know).
And while I think companies should develop for local first, but cloud enhanced, reluctant companies can still support home assistant with cloud dependency strategies. Some of my primary HA integrations are completely cloud dependent, and while I wish they were locally supported, I’m happy to keep using them even though they are cloud dependent. Cloud is not a deal breaker for me at this point, but pure local support does give a company huge leverage for me to prefer as insurance against loss of functionality due to AWS server outages, company bankruptcy, EOL end of support, etc. And I’m likely to buy more from that company due to it being a safe purchase.
Agreed. Most company objections to home assistant can easily be mitigated and many have demonstrated this. What is more dangerous is that companies that avoid advanced interoperability are taking bigger risks with higher stakes than would come from supporting it in a strategic manner.
I’m not convinced this is true. I have had lots of conversations with lots of Wyze employees, including many who actively use home assistant themselves and even use the 3rd party HACS integration for Wyze. Many are very supportive and optimistic for support winning out in the long term. The impression I have had for the last few years is that integration decisions were partially deferred to see how matter plays out in the industry, particularly seeing how things work out with the matter camera libraries. Those just recently got released and so recently that almost nobody even supports them yet (on either side… Matter servers/hubs or clients). But the market has been reluctant and slow to adopt, and the CSA had been plagued with some infighting and politicking causing delays. Many have pulled out, deciding the ongoing fees aren’t worth it and solutions like home assistant might be preferable alternatives in almost every way.
Wyze had previously updated every integration wishlist status to “probably not” except for home assistant (and matter) as possibilities to consider once the matter issues matured and settled. They always indicated that home assistant wasn’t off the table, but I got the impression (not speaking for or on behalf of Wyze) that it wouldn’t be considered while matter was a potential alternative possibility as a long term strategy. It was possible that if matter really becomes the primary standard that supporting it would automatically add support for everything else anyway. But matter hasn’t been working well as everyone hoped. It’s been plagued with issues and disappointments (speaking from experience here). But if it did mature and settle, it had the potential to resolve all integration desires for everything. A company could even in theory just develop a matter legacy bridge that would connect all their existing devices and convert them to have matter support (even if they are cloud dependent). This would instantly give every device home assistant support too, and Apple and Samsung and every other major platform. Companies wouldn’t have to maintain dozens of individual proprietary integrations that are constantly changing and hard to maintain. Plus with a matter legacy bridge, a company would only have to pay for a single matter license instead of dozens. So far, it seems matter is losing though. It hasn’t been living up to expectations. The camera libraries are still new and not really tested out in the market though. But so far I’m not all that impressed. It may not be living up to the hype, especially if it requires an ongoing license liability fee for the product.
I think this is going to lead more smart camera companies, including Wyze to conclude that instead of supporting matter to get into home assistant, the better, cheaper, safer shortcut may be to go the other way around, and choose to support home assistant in order to get into matter for free (if you support home assistant, users can leverage home assistant and it’s own matter bridge support to get any device to work as a matter device, thus bypassing the company having to pay ongoing license fees to the CSA, and do all the support development themselves). This is going to be the easiest shortcut for budget focused companies like Wyze while still making matter a possibility for those who want it. I’m reasonably optimistic Wyze and other companies will eventually come to this conclusion after careful consideration of their options. I think Wyze will soon have sufficient data about the matter camera libraries in the market to make their integration decisions related to matter v home assistant. It’s almost time. I wouldn’t be surprised to hear more official public discussion from employees regarding their decision on matter or home assistant at least within the next 18 months (would be great to be sooner) now that camera libraries are launched with matter. That was a main thing we’ve been waiting so many years for (but the CSA kept delaying).
Regardless of whether they do decide to have some devices use matter, I think they should still support home assistant natively for a variety of reasons. It’s much more powerful and versatile and preferable to many people and would still allow all the matter preference people to get things on matter if they really want. Plus allowing people to have MCP access to their devices through home assistant, etc. It’s going to be invaluable.
Me too. Matter has been found to drain batteries badly by comparison due to it’s IP-based protocol. But zigbee does have some really annoying flaws too 
but it’s the best so far.
Loved a lot of your other points too.
I think Wyze will have to critically evaluate home assistant and matter over the next 2 years whether by choice or having it forced on them for reasonable survival, so it’s good for them to hear from their users about this. It would be preferable if they were more proactive and decisive sooner. Half the work is already done for them and available through open source. They just need to make a few modifications with their actual access to the server to convert their integration and server to “push” things through home assistant like they do with Alexa, Google home, and ifttt instead of relying on polling, etc. Considering how effective and efficient a good AI harness like Claude code can make a full stack dev, this project could be completed in a lot less time and effort than it would’ve been years ago. The value vs effort for this wishlist is growing significantly and fast. I think it’s going to become extremely difficult for the leadership holdouts to keep justifying not doing home assistant. I would love them to voluntarily be decisive to do it now, but I think it’s nearly inevitable in the medium term.
I think i can all but guarantee wyze is not going to support home assistant given their displayed behavior unless there is a drastic shake up at the company.
I am all for a company making money but wyze has shown that they will do so at the expense of the customers.
Wyze hide a security breach for three years.
Changed the APi twice supposedly for security concerns but things just happened to go from free to behind a paywall.
Ignored users requests at nearly every turn.
This is not the behavior of a company concerned about it’s customers and one that’s more about short term profits.
It’s always impressive how some companies like wyze don’t seem to understand word of mouth is by far the best way to sell your products.
Many companies have realized that supporting the smart home market and the bigger smart home operating systems far outweighs and downsides. The group is steadily growing, much of the work ends up being done for them and word of mouth is priceless.
See i think many keep thinking home assistant as a niche but that’s a mistake. Home assistant itself has been constantly growing and its not the only one as we are talking companies like apple, amazon, google involved in it. This is a market that is just going to keep getting larger which is why so many companies now support the likes of home assistant. They see the benefit of supporting things now and the future profits.
Wyze could change as there have been companies in the past that turned things around but given past and present behavior i think we are going to be going elsewhere.
The one thing i never do is going on what a company says as i dealt with to many them over the years some small some large.
Talk is cheap and often buzz words and pr phrases that mean nothing. I always gone on the companies actions which are far more telling of what they are going to do long term.
Hi all — I’m a developer at Wyze, and I want to acknowledge this directly. Thank you to everyone who diagnosed it so precisely; your analysis is correct. Special thanks to @WildBill for surfacing the temporary workaround (ha-wyzeapi issue #870) that has kept people running in the meantime.
What’s happening: api.wyzecam.com currently presents a certificate that chains to the DigiCert Global Root CA (G1). Mozilla deprecated that root, and the certifi bundle removed it in the 2026.06.17 release. Newer Home Assistant environments use that bundle, so TLS verification against api.wyzecam.com fails with unable to get local issuer certificate — which the integration unfortunately surfaces as a generic “network issues” message.
Why we can’t just swap the certificate immediately: api.wyzecam.com is one of our oldest domains and serves two very different jobs (1) firmware communication between deployed Wyze devices and the cloud, and (2) the legacy APIs used by our apps and by community integrations like Home Assistant and Homebridge. Because firmware in the field also relies on this endpoint, we can’t change its certificate chain to a newer root (G2/G5) without first carefully evaluating the impact on already-deployed devices — a careless swap could knock devices offline. That evaluation and a staged rollout are the proper long-term fix, and it’s in progress.
On the app side: our web apps (wyze.com and my.wyzecam.com) no longer use api.wyzecam.com, and we’re actively removing the remaining references to it from the iOS and Android apps so that future app releases are unaffected by this domain. That work reduces the set of things depending on the old endpoint and clears the path for the eventual server-side certificate migration.
Interim fix for integrations (available now): In parallel, we’ve opened a pull request to the wyzeapy library that Home Assistant/Homebridge build on. It routes the API through app.wyzecam.com, which serves the same API behind a certificate that already chains to DigiCert Global Root G2 — trusted by current certifi bundles. This unblocks affected users without waiting on the firmware-safe server-side migration:
Once that merges and ships, updating the integration should restore connectivity. A couple of secondary service endpoints (thermostat/air purifier and locks) are still on the older chain and are being addressed as well.
We’re sorry for the disruption and the time it’s taken to respond here. We’ll follow up on this thread as the PR ships and as the server-side certificate migration progresses.
Please keep us know any other library or tools need our help. We will try our best to help !
Thanks so much !
Thank you for taking the time to address this! I appreciate the background and plan detail you’ve been willing to share, especially as it relates to this:
I’ve been suspecting that this is tied to what some users have recently been reporting in several other topics, so I appreciate knowing that this has been recognized and has a remediation plan.
Thanks @WyzeChuanzhu ! And thank you everyone surfacing this issue to us. We were able to discuss at as Wyze founders and get Chuanzhu and engineering team to create a plan to address it asap.
Thanks for a reply, I only wish it didn’t take so long to see staff comment on here.
Are you able to comment if you intend to support Home Assistant long term in this regard? I have many devices on the chopping block. Would love to support Wyze by purchasing more, but I’m on the edge because all it takes is something like this to be ignored and hundreds of dollars get wasted if they don’t integrate anymore. Looking forward to the fixes.
any updates or progress on this issue?
While we apreciate the response, I’m not sure why you’re bothering, unless you can publically commit to Home Assistant compatibility. 
It’s this comitment which seems to be skirted here & at every Reddit AMA I’ve seen. It’s only been on the Wishlist since -2018-. That would be one of the most requested features from users that now tracks for 8 YEARS! @WyzeDave
