Word of the Day

dirty dealing

Whatever the mark(et) will bear.

You making deals with this guy again? :laughing:

Nah, I’m more like these guys:

…than Shoeless Joe. :slight_smile:


1 Like

I’ll tell you what’s distinctive about these. Procreative potential. Loaded pistols.
It’s staggering. :slight_smile:

# and re-#

Describing and explaining things well is something but in the end it’s futile. If you have a hypothesis that hasn’t been proven wrong, stick with it, keep testing it – instead of jonesing for another hypothesis to replace it because you and your ‘audience’ are bored.

That one took me a few moments to decipher. That’s good. It makes my real human

work.

When I was getting ready to move on from a position years ago and wanted to do some training with someone whom I expected to take over the public-facing Web site, I was trying to explain how I used raw HTML (instead of always relying on the WYSIWYG-ish editor) to create a link to an anchor within a particular page as a way to navigate to specific content rather than directing the user to the top of the page itself. I tried do describe using the “number sign” or “pound sign” in doing this, and pointed to it on her keyboard. She said something like, “Oh, you mean the hashtag?” Maybe I should’ve said “splat” or “crunch”.

:exploding_head:

1 Like

Interesting links! :+1:

1 Like

Thanks. :grin:

I started using Internet Archive Wayback Machine links whenever I cite The Jargon File just to avoid browser hiccups, because the main site at catb.org apparently doesn’t support HTTPS.

1 Like

:index_pointing_at_the_viewer: :hash: :plus:

:wink:

1 Like

spin_span_spun

1 Like

shock of hair

A bomb drops on the courtyard.

Time to get up? says one. Relax, sleep in, says the other. I can’t, the smell, says one.

Try the other side.

Enshittification

Is it happening to Wyze?

The pan V4 is probably the worst Wyze product introduction; so far.

What is “good,” after all?   :slight_smile:

WYZE in action

2 Likes

:laughing:

That’s a fun graph. The contrast between UK and US participants, particularly with respect to certain words/phrases, certain modifiers, and certain graph segments is something I probably wouldn’t have predicted.

2 Likes

It’s also interesting that the RANGE extreme is greater in both directions for the UK. They see the uttermost negative words as much more negative and the far end positive words as more positive.

It looks like the US didn’t rate “Mediocre” for some reason? If it’s the exact same score, I would think it they should’ve made that a bit more obvious.

2 Likes