dirty dealing
Whatever the mark(et) will bear.
Iâll tell you whatâs distinctive about these. Procreative potential. Loaded pistols.
Itâs staggering.
Describing and explaining things well is something but in the end itâs futile. If you have a hypothesis that hasnât been proven wrong, stick with it, keep testing it â instead of jonesing for another hypothesis to replace it because you and your âaudienceâ are bored.
That one took me a few moments to decipher. Thatâs good. It makes my real human
work.
When I was getting ready to move on from a position years ago and wanted to do some training with someone whom I expected to take over the public-facing Web site, I was trying to explain how I used raw HTML (instead of always relying on the WYSIWYG-ish editor) to create a link to an anchor within a particular page as a way to navigate to specific content rather than directing the user to the top of the page itself. I tried do describe using the ânumber signâ or âpound signâ in doing this, and pointed to it on her keyboard. She said something like, âOh, you mean the hashtag?â Maybe I shouldâve said âsplatâ or âcrunchâ.
Interesting links!
Thanks.
I started using Internet Archive Wayback Machine links whenever I cite The Jargon File just to avoid browser hiccups, because the main site at catb.org apparently doesnât support HTTPS.
A bomb drops on the courtyard.
Time to get up? says one. Relax, sleep in, says the other. I canât, the smell, says one.
Try the other side.
Enshittification
Is it happening to Wyze?
The pan V4 is probably the worst Wyze product introduction; so far.
WYZE in action
Thatâs a fun graph. The contrast between UK and US participants, particularly with respect to certain words/phrases, certain modifiers, and certain graph segments is something I probably wouldnât have predicted.
Itâs also interesting that the RANGE extreme is greater in both directions for the UK. They see the uttermost negative words as much more negative and the far end positive words as more positive.
It looks like the US didnât rate âMediocreâ for some reason? If itâs the exact same score, I would think it they shouldâve made that a bit more obvious.