She must have unique foot prints in the sand.
How about fixing the left hand of the girl in the first picture
Yikes! That was the very first thing that got my attention, too.
I thought there was something odd but seems she has all of her fingers and she can hold the camera well enough. I can overlook her uniqueness.
What about that last photo? I think it is one of my best generations.
Hmm, I think she has an index finger for a thumb
Honestly, it looks so real. If I didnât know I would have thought it is a real photograph. 2-4 are not too shabby.
EhâŚstill seems off to me. They all appear to have some weird form of arachnodactyly, like maybe theyâre Marfanoid or something.
I think it is your AI bias or AI fear.
That last picture looks great. You usually point out the flaws clearly.
Is âseemsâ a feeling or is there any true logic?
Definitely the former. Although the generated images can be interesting or amusing, I lean toward @peepeepâs other topic title: Post your dam AI art here and keep it out of the other threads, it's GROSS đ¤Ž. Iâm not saying that the AI tools arenât useful or that they canât produce intriguing imagery, but I maintain my previously stated belief that they tend to make mistakes that an actual human artist likely wouldnât, especially when it comes to detailed elements of a composition.
Itâs not terrible, and I can imagine people mistaking it for an actual photograph at a glance, but, again, where the AI fails is apparent in the details. For instance, look at the area of the shirt near the collar (the blue shirt thatâs off-shoulder and draped on the back). The stripes arenât continuous in the way that actual fabric would appear when photographed, and the AI has difficulty determining where the edge of the fabric should be versus where the fabric folds over itself, so thereâs some unnecessary noise in the image there that appears as blur or artifact. Itâs places like thatâlike where the AI seems to be unable to make a âdecisionâ and commitâwhere thereâs still a lot of room for improvement with these kinds of tools.
Part of it is gestalt. Part of it is experience with a variety of anatomic variants and knowledge of what does and doesnât fall within the range of ânormalâ.
That is the comment I was looking for. It âseemsâ was a bit weak.
Thanks. I still like it but opinions may vary.
That particular verb was specifically with respect to the digits. I couldâve been more clear initially.
Iâm not saying youâre wrong, and I like that we can have conflicting opinions and still get along here.
I agree. I just like your definitive answers and got used to your decisive, constructive criticisms.
Thanks man.
Not even! Theyâre just my opinions, far from definitive. Glad to know theyâre appreciated, though. Thanks!
Sorry, I meant more defined, not as a definitive solution.
I do appreciate your views. Sometimes, I can accept them. Maybe even often times.
Thatâs acceptable. If we agreed on everything all the time, then this would all be super boring.
Wyze Stocking Stuffers
Wyze Toothpaste
Wyze Laundry Detergent
Wyze Body Lotion
Wyze Facial Cleanser
Ideas for Future Wyze Products.
No. I think they should stick to Electronics and digital stuff, particularly Smart Home related.
It would be a challenge to realistically disrupt any of the above industries.
There is still a ton of room to disrupt the smart home industry and make a dent there. I just wish theyâd expand it beyond cameras again.
Hey @Crease stop changing your profile pic. I canât keep up!
Shhhh, donât tell him that. It just encourages him to change it more often.