Post your dam AI art here and keep it out of the other threads, it's GROSS šŸ¤®

I appreciate the vote of confidence, but I also ism is an amateur. This is what I threw together with GIMP:

I dunce know if thatā€™s the kind of thing @Antonius is seeking, though. :man_shrugging:

3 Likes

I knew you could do it. :+1:

1 Like

That will work. Now it needs replace the one on the support page. :laughing:
Thanks.

2 Likes

Can you imagine the issues we will see in the forum of the future when Wyze collaborates with Telsaā€™s Neural Link. Then we will it hear, ā€œMy Neural Link is fine. Itā€™s not my Neural link or even my brain. Itā€™s got to be the Wyze firmware.ā€

I asked AI to buld me a Neural Link that works with Wyze, but here was its reply:

That sounds like a fascinating and futuristic project! While Iā€™m not currently capable of creating hardware, I can certainly provide you with some insights that might help conceptualize such an integration. I should be capable to help you with the design before 2030.

A Tesla Neural Link could theoretically connect to Wyze cameras for several purposes, such as monitoring or controlling a home security system via a neural interface. Hereā€™s a high-level overview of how such an integration might work:

  1. Neural Interface Technology: Tesla Neural Linkā€™s technology would need to include interfaces that can read and interpret neural signals, potentially decoding intentions to control or retrieve data from the cameras.

  2. Communication Protocols: The Wyze cameras would need to support APIs or protocols that allow for integration with external devices. Protocols such as MQTT or HTTP could be used to send commands or receive video feeds and alerts.

  3. Middleware: A middleware system would be necessary to translate neural signals into commands that the Wyze cameras understand. This could involve software running on a local server or cloud-based service.

  4. Neural Training: Extensive neural training would be required to ensure the Neural Link can accurately interpret the userā€™s brain signals and translate them into specific commands, such as turning the cameras on or off, adjusting settings, or viewing live feeds.

  5. Security Considerations: The system would need robust security measures to protect user privacy and prevent unauthorized access. Encrypted data transmission and multi-factor authentication could be part of this setup.

  6. User Interface: Although many commands would be neural-based, an auxiliary user interface could be beneficial for setup and diagnostics. This might include a mobile app or web portal for managing the integration.

Such a system could revolutionize how we interact with home security, offering a seamless, hands-free experience. What aspects of this integration intrigue you the most?

The only aspects I am concerned with are two things:

1. I imagine this will require a subscription, can I get a reduced subscription that has adverts for one nominal cost?

2. Are there any side-effects or pain involved for the implementation?

ā€¦and/or implantation!

1 Like

Funny. My Dad lives in Plantation.

Another thought I had was that if the Neuralink implementation/implantation fails, then you might run the risk of becoming a plant (i.e., vegetable) or, possibly, being planted in the ground! :headstone: :skull_and_crossbones: :grimacing:

1 Like

Yeah. Youā€™re right. Itā€™s not worth the risk. :brain:

I will let others go first. :smiley:

AI should mind its knitting. Get out of art and work on this:

1 Like

Maybe Wyze developers are using AI, thatā€™s why their stuff is full of bugs :laughing:

1 Like

Your starting to catch on to my perspective!

I donā€™t see why they need to stop doing one thing in order to do another. They can do both. In a way this is like telling humans to stop all education except for classes on how to paint. In my opinion, itā€™s totally fine if different ones specialize in different things or if a person is good at or can do multiple things at the same time. Great, more power to them.

Many people would argue that the above use case of codeine is also a kind of art. But this is a great example of how AI is such a great tool of augmentation rather than a complete replacement. This use case clearly outlines one of the best reasons to use AI: augmentation and as a tool rather than 100% replacement of top performers.

People with limited artistic skills or resources can use Al to express themselves artistically. In this way, it actually expands accessibility for artistic expression to people who wouldnā€™t normally be able to express themselves in artistic ways because they donā€™t have certain skill sets but still wish to do so. I think this is a fantastic reason for AI. I canā€™t draw worth anything, but I still have plenty of artistic ideas that I wish to express and AI makes that much more accessible and possible for me when my whole life I havenā€™t really been able to do so because I lacked the skill set and time.

Even for those who do have some skills, they definitely donā€™t have all artistic skills. So there is nobody out there can do interdisciplinary implementations of a lot of things . But Alā€™s ability to analyze and combine elements from various disciplines can lead to groundbreaking creative works that push the boundaries of traditional art Rather than reduce them. In many ways it actually expands and makes art better and possible for humans to do artistic things that were previously potentially impossible due to lack of skill set in areas they are deficient and lacking.

Al can handle repetitive tasks, allowing artists to focus on more complex and meaningful aspects of their work. This can speed up the creative process and reduce burnout. It makes people way more efficient.

Ai often helps with inspiration. I recently converted my wife to using AI for this purpose. She will bounce ideas off the AI, use it like a consultant, generate potential examples, then draft her own documents and contacts and then make sure she didnā€™t forget or overlook something important or obvious or leave a potential vulnerability or flaw (similar to hecking for bugs),

Al can help create highly personalized content tailored to individual preferences.

I bet youā€™ve used calculators to do some math at some point in your life. You absolutely could have done that without a calculator. Why did you use the calculator? You totally could have paid another human to do the calculations for you as well. Why didnā€™t you just pay them to do it for you?

What about using search engines? Have you ever googled something? Why didnā€™t you drive To someone with a PhD and pay them hundreds of dollars to answer your question instead so that youā€™re not taking away from them earning money for the knowledge that theyā€™re learning and sharing?

Remember when people said digital cameras would ruin photography? Instead, they made it more accessible and led to incredible innovations in how we capture and share moments. Traditional film photography didnā€™t die; it found its niche and continued to evolve. To me, AI is the same.

Software like GarageBand and Ableton Live have enabled countless musicians to create and produce music themselves without needing a full recording studio. This didnā€™t replace talented musicians but it instead empowered more people to make music. To me, AI is the same.

Artists and designers use now using 3D printing to bring their visions to life in ways that were previously impossible. Itā€™s a tool that expands creative possibilities rather than replacing the artistā€™s vision. To me, AI is the same.

Tools like Adobe Photoshop and Illustrator have transformed the graphic design world. Designers still need creativity and vision, but now they have powerful tools to execute their ideas more efficiently. To me, AI is no different.

Programs like Grammarly help writers by catching errors and suggesting improvements. They donā€™t replace the writerā€™s voice but help polish it. My Philipino Assistant uses it all the time and I am totally okay with thatā€¦actually I prefer it. It would be pointless to hire someone to review all his writing and grammar. Iā€™m paying for him to get a job done and I donā€™t care that he uses AI tools like Grammarly to get it done right. To me, this is a key point of AI.

VR platforms allow artists to create immersive environments and experiences. Without the assistance of AI, some people could never do any of this. AI isnā€™t doing 100% of the work, but it is a new tool that makes a lot of their creative vision finally possible.

Itā€™s about augmentation and accessibility, not replacement. AI can help people who lack specific skills to still express their ideas and enhance the work of skilled professionals.

You probably use a smartphone to access information and stay organized. Why donā€™t you go back to doing all that manually or paying for an assistant to do it all for you instead? AI in creative fields is similarā€”itā€™s about using tools to enhance, expand, and streamline our abilities and make things more accessible to more people. It improves things much more than not IMO.

If humans do ā€œartā€ or something else better than AI, then they have nothing to worry about anyway. If people prefer Human Art, then they have nothing to fear from AI doing things anyway. There will still be humans doing art. Cameras didnā€™t stop all people from drawing/painting either.

I think the AI hate is mostly a fadā€¦one that comes with every major technological change. Humans are very good at adaptation. Weā€™ll be fine, and in my opinion BETTER than fine. The example of using AI for software debugging is an excellent example. In a way thatā€™s what many people use it for in the majority of use cases. Thatā€™s kind of been my main point all along. :wink:

1 Like

Talking :turkey:

H: Have you killed things?
AI: I have killed things.
H: Will you kill me?
AI: I donā€™t know but I might.

Living things are animated. And they invest other things with the spirit that moves them.

Itā€™s a mystery.

1 Like

1 Like

Ā”ĀæQuien es mas macho?!

1 Like

Katie unbars the door post DeepSeek (~9:00-10:30)

POTUS believes in restoring AI dominance. And thatā€™s why he took very strong executive action this past week to sign executive orders to roll back some of the onerous regulations on the AI industry.

So we have no choice, itā€™s an arms race. Ready or not, here it comes.

image

If itā€™s an arms race then why did DeepSeek opensource everything so anyone and everyone can copy it and do it themselves for cheaper? They couldā€™ve kept it closed source and dominated the marketā€¦undercutting all rivals for a very long time. They had a ton of leverage. And they just gave it all away for free to EVERYONE.

From my perspective theyā€™re kind of looking like the heroes that made affordable high quality AI available to everyone instead of centralized with a few billionairesā€¦ :man_shrugging: More power to them IMO, especially since I want my own local AI within the next couple of years and DeepSeek is making it possible that I will be able to do that extremely cheaply with an extremely high level AI. Iā€™m over here celebrating the miracle. :wink:

1 Like

Itā€™s an arms race because we see it that way, I guess.

This son of a gun lived to 106 and did some fine work.

Maybe itā€™ll all work out. :crossed_fingers:

1 Like

Definitely a Watercooler topic, but I donā€™t believe they made it into a movie. So I didnā€™t want to litter @Newshound 's thread.

With all of this talk about AI and DeepSeek, the author that wrote a very interesting book in 2014 fits into todayā€™s world at 2025. They were interviewing the author on a podcast and then I remembered reading this book about the good and bad of AI. It was a great read, or listen.

1 Like

I like singularity and advanced tech SciFi :slight_smile:

1 Like