Different levels of "reset"

I guess I’m reset happy at the moment.

My mesh router finally added the ability to ‘anchor’ a device to a particular node. Now I can reset all cams on a daily schedule and only benefit by it.

The router also gained the ability to reboot itself on a schedule!

Router and cams now look at modem like, ‘You think you’re better than us?’ :slight_smile:

2 Likes

Wondering why you would want to anchor a device to a particular node. I have a Netgear Orbi mesh router…tlhutch4

1 Like

Hey tlhutch4

Best signal and performance.

More at the linked comment. :slight_smile:

2 Likes

@peepeep
Clearly I do not know enough about my fairly new Netgear Orbi router. You have helped in that endeavor but I need to get better educated on it and it’s capabiliies. Maybe I should youtube it…tlhutch4

2 Likes

Let us know how the Orbi works out for you. Did you consider buying the Wyze?

@peepeep
I did consider buying a Wyze router but went with Netgear ORBI because I was familiar with that brand of router. However the mesh (satellite) part was new to me.
After my note to the Forum yesterday I did some more research and called Netgear technical Support and also my internet provider (Greenlight fios) and got all of my questions answered. The system is working fine.
Thanks, tlhutch4

1 Like
  • Refresh device connection via router optimization or unbind/bind functionalities.

I discovered today that when a Wyze device goes offline, if your router supports binding and/or optimization to individual devices, running them can refresh the connection and bring the offline device back online. You just need to find your device with matching MAC address.

Woohoo! I’m going to try this next time my floodlight goes offline. This is a usable workaround for me, because I don’t need to physically be there to power-cycle the Wyze camera or plug.

1 Like

Things that work are awesome!   :slight_smile:

Are you saying you can actually optimize per device??   And it power-cycles (vs warm reboots)? And what do you mean by bind/unbind?

I have optimization with my TP-Link mesh thing but I’m scared of it.

Last time I tried it it improved my network like a pigeon landing on a chess board (improves the game.)

BUT

The latest firmware with its device-anchoring capacity (that works) and the per-device address reservation (which always worked) may make my current fears unfounded.

Though I still hesitate to touch Scan. :fearful:

My ASUS router has a devices list per mesh node. I can drill into each device (connected or offline) and select Bind to anchor that device to a particular mesh node. I had to do this because somehow by default all devices love to connect to my wired node (the one all the way at one side of the house, behind a brick fireplace).

The router doesn’t power-cycle anything, but it’s able to somehow refresh the connection with offline devices.

When I noticed my OG and plug went offline, I found them under the offline list, then unbind/bind it back to the mesh node. I also was able to just click on optimize and it would refresh the connection and come back online.

I tried running optimize before and didn’t notice any difference in signal strength. I suppose it might have done something but I couldn’t tell what…

1 Like

Thanks, IL1! It’s good to compare.

Well, I touched it. :man_facepalming:

More later, maybe. :sob:

2 Likes

No, not ‘perfect.’ All fouled up.

This optimization is a black box set on ‘improving’ whatever condition it is allowed to operate on.

My network didn’t need ‘optimizing,’ It had been stable and serving me well for many months. But… could it be better? Maybe, but actually, no.

And since the logic it uses is opaque to the user, and the user has no option to manually set channels used (like to the ones that were working before optimizing - and there is no option to revert) customer is stuck with a network scrambled in performance, which subsequent scans inform him is ‘perfect.’

Ultimately, I power cycled the modem, the mesh router and one remote node, all the cams, bulbs and plugs, hoping the core router logic would return me to where I was before ‘optimizing.’

Then I ‘trained’ the system by letting the timed ‘sequence’ feature of tinyCam cycle between cams for a few hours, then cam groups for a few hours, and I was pretty much back where I started: ‘stable & well-served.’
:face_exhaling:

UPDATE (10 days later)

The optimization feature is now usable. When performance degrades, optimizing improves cam connectivity at least minimally.


1 Like

If set to ON, must reassert:

  • Account > App Settings > Enable Hardware Decoder
  • Account > About > Opt Out of Data Sharing
  • Custom Android Notification reset to Wyze Sound 1 image

After reinstall.
 


 
More

 


 
And

Bind/unbind had the same useful effect with TP-Link Deco app.

Also, scanning for optimization goosed things nicely - whereas actually optimizing was a net negative (borks 5Ghz band, main and backhaul channels, somehow. :man_shrugging: )

Arrows in the quiver. :bow_and_arrow:

2 Likes

Yes I signed out and back in to the app then my v3 pro started working again.

3 Likes

The whole megillah :wink:

2 Likes

I agree. If the device is stationary use the closest connection point.

1 Like

Wow @carverofchoice that’s a nice troubleshooting guide. Thanks @peepeep for linking it!

I think one of these days Wyze should create a decision tree with a bunch of questions (i.e. Does this happen to all cameras? Did this work before?) so one can know what to do. It can be their first-line Support.

2 Likes

Steve!

Yep, and Wyze Mesh Router owners may be clamoring for a setting to achieve it.

Sometimes observant customers are best qualified to determine the best setting. :slight_smile:

1 Like

:+1:

And this, someone should do this, too!

@WyzeMatt may even give cash prizes for the one best-realized! :wink:

Yes.

Our new AI shopping assistant is actually not terrible at answering some of these questions.

2 Likes

Hey Matt

Cool! Just go to a product page on the Wyze shopping site and ask it what and how? Can you give an explicit ‘for instance’ when you have a moment? :slight_smile:

(Or maybe @IL1 will try it. They’re intrepid on that front. :man_superhero: :woman_superhero: )