App 3.0 poses questions only a [POLL] can answer! 😁

Watercooler
88

:astonished:
image

…apparently.  

2 Likes
89
90

Is this what the youngsters call a re-tweet?

1 Like
91

I don’t talk to them anymore. They AI auto-reply me all the time and think I don’t know it. Trust me, I know it. :grin:

2 Likes
92

image

More versatile finger work :point_up: courtesy Blake Edward’s wife.

93

1 Like
94

This is a statistically significant bump! Everyone says so!

image
image562×503 51.1 KB

Hang on, kids, we’re off to test the old highs! :ferris_wheel:

1 Like
95

image

So far I’m not so crazy. You made a little money on the ‘extension’, kids. :grin:

Isn’t daytrading wonderful? It’s what our future is based on!

96

Bah, day trading is just gambling. People get lucky and problem it as skill, but it rarely is.

Studies show that only about 13% of day traders maintain consistent profitability over six months, and a mere 1% achieve long-term success over five years. More than 99% of professional day traders are not profitable and certainly not consistently so. There are a lot of good reasons for this. But there are other investment strategies with way higher and more effective success rates.

By contrast, I’m a huge proponent of some variation of consistent DCA with long term performance strategies… Possibly with modifications where your increase the buying rates when prices are low and decreasing when prices are high, similar to recommended strategies for retirement withdrawal amounts as the market fluctuates.

Though in the end, almost any strategy is better than doing nothing. Here’s a really cool analysis on some different investing strategies over the market history to make that point pretty solidly:

So, no, I don’t think day trading is wonderful. :sweat_smile: I think it’s nearly impossible to be long term consistently successful that way. DCA is wonderful though. :wink:

97

*Circa the 90s, what percentage year-over-year gain did the very best hedge funds make for their clients?

*What was the minimum dollar investment required to be accepted as a client?

Strictly from your noodle, no looking it up with your fancy AI machine. :stuck_out_tongue_winking_eye:

98

I don’t know. :man_shrugging:

Meh, strictly from your noodle is overrated as I said before:

99

Yeah I remember you saying that, still good to have a refresher and for others.

IIRC, it was 20 percent and 1M (to apply, not guarantee acceptance.). I’m sure about the first number, not as much on the second, but it gives a rough idea. :slightly_smiling_face:

100

You should play View Stocks for the “WYZE app 3.0 Released” post, now up to 6,000 views or better yet the Pepé Le Pew & Friends Post at 24.6K. Just think of all the pennies you would have. :moneybag: That is a lot of flies you could be snacking on. :yum:

101

I know, huh, except after you have so many pennies and flies you can’t spend or eat them all, it becomes a game of comparing Richards and how much fun is that?

Better to sit here so contentedly and watch the river flow… :slightly_smiling_face:

102

Donate the excess to the Save the Frogs Foundation, there has to be one someplace. :grin: :grin:

Screenshot (728)
Screenshot (728)1897×792 273 KB

103

:grin: I have felt a little ‘threatened’ lately, good on them! :+1:

104

You better get busy procreating. :frog: :frog: :two_hearts: :laughing:

1 Like
105

Aw, that’s cute, we do our best (after a fashion.) Trust in your fallow man. :corn:

106

Seems to me there’s a purposeful vagueness being dropped over the facts here like you’d do with white dust covers over furniture off-season at your country estate. :house:

image

People who are usually on-it on-it on-it on-it are like, wull, i donno, it’s not really clear, durrrr…

What gives? :thinking:

1 Like
107

Classic continuation pattern :nerd_face:

image

:bullettrain_front: All aboard! :tada: :dancing_women: :partying_face:

Turn that frown upside down! :upside_down_face:

1 Like