@Antonius & @towelkingdom I just recently noticed that about both of y’all, as well as some others in recent months. Congrats!
What I like about wikis is that they can be edited/amended when new information develops (for instance, when Wyze decides to add a new feature to a product line via an app or firmware update) instead of being historical or static, like a lot of other documents, so it seems like something like that might mollify some users who want documentation that’s more like a manual than what Wyze provides but still has the flexibility for growth when the content becomes outdated or inaccurate. On the other hand, the Forum already has the Tips & Tricks category that seems like a good place for user-created articles, and I personally think that Wyze should to a better job of maintaining its own accurate documentation in the Help Center.
If someone really wanted to, I guess that person could start an independent OWW—preferably with an apt logo to indicate user pain—and that should relatively easy to do (in a previous job, someone at our institution decided to use PBworks’s wiki product, and I got a lot of work done inside that; there are certainly other “free” options available), but I wouldn’t want to be responsible for maintaining it. Seems like the maintenance and policing could potentially be a weighty (trying to be at least tangentially relevant to the topic) task.