šŸŽ„ What a forum thread looks like (were you to scroll it before posting)

This makes me think of all the people losing their :poop: because they think Wyze is forcibly violating them with the changes to Cam v3’s UI or all the :scream:ing and gnashing of :tooth::tooth: that followed the Wyze app v3’s launch last year. In both instances, the changes seemed to result in a bumper crop of new topics from (often new) users :enraged_face: and unwilling to spend the time finding the appropriate existing topic (and often accompanying solution) before posting their own angry (and frequently misinformed) rants and conspiracy theory speculations.

I completely agree that those aren’t very useful, and they’re frustrating for me to see, too. :face_exhaling:

I like that you feel free to express your own exasperation here, and I think I have a little better understanding of what you were suggesting in your initial post and title, though I wonder if a <vent> would be better categorized in Watercooler. :man_shrugging:

The other thing that occurred to me as I’m replying is the way Discourse has in the past suggested existing topics that might be a good fit when someone begins typing out a new topic. That’s what I’ve seen in the right preview pane when using the ā€œstandard Markdown editorā€, and I imagine a lot of people just ignored those. Now with the ā€œnew rich text editorā€ (which I believe is the default, but it’s not what I prefer to use), I don’t know if those same suggestions are presented, and I wonder if that contributes to the repetitive topic overload. I haven’t tested and don’t know the answer to that.

Humans are going to be humans in any case, so we have to take the bad with the good, I reckon.