Fair enough. Challenge accepted. Besides the fact that employees have told me this themselves multiple times, I will find some public references over the years for people:
Here is one statement from an AMA that seems to be definitive for everything in the company, and then clarifies that this includes the Palm Lock:
Wyze, in compliance with applicable law, will only provide user data to law enforcement in response to a valid subpoena, warrant or other similar official legal request.
Their reaction/response sounds pretty definitive to me, and they’ve reiterated it ever since.
They have also left the status of the wishlist item for this topic officially listed as “Probably Not”:
The wishlist is made to match their internal systems, so if they did this, that wishlist will be updated to “Wish Granted”…so feel free to “Follow” that thread to be notified if that status ever changes.
This also came up last September on X after the Charlie Kirk incident, with details here:
I believe this has been brought up in more AMA’s too, but I didn’t take the time to search them all. If a person needs more direct evidence, then remember to ask about it again during the next AMA event, or follow @Seapup 's great advice to ask yourself through the proper channel:
No offense taken. I knew authoritative sources existed, I was just trying to give the TL;DR answer that they have stated countless times they don’t do this, and never plan to. They said it’s not even a consideration or discussion point and would violate their foundational core values.
