# Separate IR source

**URL:** <https://forums.wyze.com/t/separate-ir-source/12640>\
**Category:** Power & Lighting\
**Created:** [December 28, 2018, 4:15pm UTC](https://forums.wyze.com/t/separate-ir-source/12640 "2018-12-28T16:15:34Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![OverWatch](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/3bc359/32.png) [@OverWatch](https://forums.wyze.com/u/OverWatch)\
**Post date:** [December 28, 2018, 4:15pm UTC](https://forums.wyze.com/t/separate-ir-source/12640/1 "2018-12-28T16:15:34Z")

</div>

Assuming the “in-development” for turning the off IR lights is for the existing camera base including my V2s, I would like to start researching separate IR sources. Bugs are a real problem and having the light source away from the camera will give us potentially more light and a far enough away place for the bugs to buzz around so as to not trigger alert notifications. It will also solve the light reflecting off glass problems.

Has anyone researched this? Any good suggestions? Any things to avoid? Is there a particular wave-length to go for or to avoid? Thanks in advance.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![OverWatch](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/3bc359/32.png) [@OverWatch](https://forums.wyze.com/u/OverWatch)\
**Post date:** [January 4, 2019, 12:16pm UTC](https://forums.wyze.com/t/separate-ir-source/12640/2 "2019-01-04T12:16:20Z")

</div>

I have a birthday coming up and I was hoping to score some recommendations on outdoor IR lighting for gift ideas. Even links to articles would help.

I’ll post this light because someone posted a comparison photo showing no light and three different models. I was surprised there seemed very little difference between this one and some of the advertised 130ft+ models. This one claims 80ft.

> **[Amazon.com : Tendelux 80ft IR Illuminator | AI4 No Hot Spot Wide Angle Infrared...](https://www.amazon.com/Tendelux-Illuminator-AI4-Infrared-Security/dp/B075ZYG89D)**
>
> Amazon.com : Tendelux 80ft IR Illuminator | AI4 No Hot Spot Wide Angle Infrared Light for Security Camera (w/Power Adapter) : Electronics

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![OverWatch](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/3bc359/32.png) [@OverWatch](https://forums.wyze.com/u/OverWatch)\
**Post date:** [January 4, 2019, 2:27pm UTC](https://forums.wyze.com/t/separate-ir-source/12640/3 "2019-01-04T14:27:53Z")

</div>

Does anyone know the wavelengths that Wyze will operate in?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Loki](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/wyze/user_avatar/forums.wyze.com/loki/32/1595_2.png) [@Loki](https://forums.wyze.com/u/Loki)\
**Post date:** [January 4, 2019, 4:13pm UTC](https://forums.wyze.com/t/separate-ir-source/12640/4 "2019-01-04T16:13:07Z")

</div>

850nm, found here:

[https://support.wyzecam.com/hc/en-us/articles/360012369411-What-is-the-Wyze-Cam-s-range-](https://support.wyzecam.com/hc/en-us/articles/360012369411-What-is-the-Wyze-Cam-s-range-)

Here’s an example of an external source at that frequency that I found:

[https://smile.amazon.com/Infrared-Illuminator-Degree-Waterproof-Security/dp/B07CP66631/ref=sr\_1\_1\_sspa?ie=UTF8&qid=1546618416&sr=8-1-spons&keywords=850nm+led&psc=1](https://smile.amazon.com/Infrared-Illuminator-Degree-Waterproof-Security/dp/B07CP66631/ref=sr_1_1_sspa?ie=UTF8&qid=1546618416&sr=8-1-spons&keywords=850nm+led&psc=1)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![OverWatch](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/3bc359/32.png) [@OverWatch](https://forums.wyze.com/u/OverWatch)\
**Post date:** [January 4, 2019, 4:29pm UTC](https://forums.wyze.com/t/separate-ir-source/12640/5 "2019-01-04T16:29:26Z")

</div>

Thanks Rick, that’s the wavelength of the current onboard lights that glow red. I think I’ve read where other wavelength LEDs are invisible, at least to us. So hopefully, if they are also invisible to the bugs, do they work with the Wyzecams? I don’t know the answer to either question at this point, but hope to find out. I was sort of hoping the outdoor camera guy(s) had maybe already researched this.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![OverWatch](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/3bc359/32.png) [@OverWatch](https://forums.wyze.com/u/OverWatch)\
**Post date:** [January 4, 2019, 4:35pm UTC](https://forums.wyze.com/t/separate-ir-source/12640/6 "2019-01-04T16:35:40Z")

</div>

Maybe I just need one of these.

> **[Laser Bug Zapper Inches To Market](https://spectrum.ieee.org/laser-bug-zapper-inches-to-market-)**
>
> A joint venture announced last week plans to commercialize a pest-control system with roots in the old Star Wars missile defense system

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Loki](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/wyze/user_avatar/forums.wyze.com/loki/32/1595_2.png) [@Loki](https://forums.wyze.com/u/Loki)\
**Post date:** [January 4, 2019, 4:38pm UTC](https://forums.wyze.com/t/separate-ir-source/12640/7 "2019-01-04T16:38:29Z")

</div>

Yeah, I don’t know how wide the spectrum of the sensor is, and therefore what frequencies of IR will be visible.

Also, the Pan apparently uses 940nm LEDs:

[https://support.wyzecam.com/hc/en-us/articles/360012431491-What-is-the-Wyze-Cam-Pan-s-range-and-field-of-view-](https://support.wyzecam.com/hc/en-us/articles/360012431491-What-is-the-Wyze-Cam-Pan-s-range-and-field-of-view-)

That makes me wonder if the link I provided above is for the V1 (since it mentions 2 LEDs) and perhaps the V2 is also 940nm.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DreadPirateRush](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/wyze/user_avatar/forums.wyze.com/dreadpiraterush/32/1531_2.png) [@DreadPirateRush](https://forums.wyze.com/u/DreadPirateRush)\
**Post date:** [January 4, 2019, 4:41pm UTC](https://forums.wyze.com/t/separate-ir-source/12640/8 "2019-01-04T16:41:00Z")

</div>

The V2 is 850nm.

> **[Wyze Cam v3 | Wired Security Camera](https://www.wyze.com/products/wyze-cam)**
>
> Meet the #1 best-selling multi-use security camera. Great for indoor, outdoor, or anywhere in between. Need a pet cam? How about a baby monitor? Get creative!

(UGH, I can’t type today)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![OverWatch](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/3bc359/32.png) [@OverWatch](https://forums.wyze.com/u/OverWatch)\
**Post date:** [January 4, 2019, 4:42pm UTC](https://forums.wyze.com/t/separate-ir-source/12640/9 "2019-01-04T16:42:52Z")

</div>

> [@Loki](#):
>
> That makes me wonder if the link I provided above is for the V1 (since it mentions 2 LEDs) and perhaps the V2 is also 940nm.

I just read that 940nm isn’t visible, so only one source so far, but if that is true my V2s all glow red meaning they are the 850 nm LEDs. I haven’t found if bugs are attracted to 940nm yet.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Loki](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/wyze/user_avatar/forums.wyze.com/loki/32/1595_2.png) [@Loki](https://forums.wyze.com/u/Loki)\
**Post date:** [January 4, 2019, 5:07pm UTC](https://forums.wyze.com/t/separate-ir-source/12640/10 "2019-01-04T17:07:32Z")

</div>

I confirm. Turning on the LEDs on both a V2 and Pan in a dimly lit room… the V2 LEDs are visible, the Pan’s are not. Really makes me wonder why they are using a different wavelength for each.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Loki](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/wyze/user_avatar/forums.wyze.com/loki/32/1595_2.png) [@Loki](https://forums.wyze.com/u/Loki)\
**Post date:** [January 4, 2019, 5:35pm UTC](https://forums.wyze.com/t/separate-ir-source/12640/11 "2019-01-04T17:35:26Z")

</div>

UPDATE: with Pan and V2 in a totally dark room, the LEDs on the Pan are visible, but barely visible. Much less so than the V2.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Loki](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/wyze/user_avatar/forums.wyze.com/loki/32/1595_2.png) [@Loki](https://forums.wyze.com/u/Loki)\
**Post date:** [January 4, 2019, 5:45pm UTC](https://forums.wyze.com/t/separate-ir-source/12640/12 "2019-01-04T17:45:33Z")

</div>

I just did some experimenting with interesting results.

First a review of how the IR cut filter works. In day mode, the IR filter is normally in place between the lens and the sensor to remove IR light which would result in a purple cast. In night mode, the IR filter is pulled out of the way.

Fun fact: you can manually change the position of the IR filter by placing a strong magnet on either side of the camera, regardless of day/night mode. Here’s what I did:

In a totally dark room, I put a V2 in day mode (LEDs off), but pulled the filter out of the way with a magnet. Then I used the LEDs on a Pam to illuminate my face. The V2 was clearly sensitive to the 940nm light from the Pan. I did the same thing using a 2nd V2 for illumination. The V2 was equally sensitive to this light.

Conclusion: you can use a 940nm light source as illumination for a V2, it should work fine, and be less visible to humans than a 850nm source.

Possible hack: Put a V2 in day mode but tape a magnet to the side to pull the filter out of the way. This will simulate night mode with LEDs off. You can then use an external illumination source.

Catches to the above hack:

1. The camera will be no good for daytime use (purple cast).

2. Even at night there is a distinct purple cast in this configuration. Apparently night mode also has the function of putting the sensor into black & white mode.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DreadPirateRush](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/wyze/user_avatar/forums.wyze.com/dreadpiraterush/32/1531_2.png) [@DreadPirateRush](https://forums.wyze.com/u/DreadPirateRush)\
**Post date:** [January 4, 2019, 6:01pm UTC](https://forums.wyze.com/t/separate-ir-source/12640/13 "2019-01-04T18:01:51Z")

</div>

I used to get alerts all of the time on one of my V2s in my barn when my Pan would move with the IR LEDs lit. I had to adjust the detection zone on the V2 so it wouldn’t alert on that anymore.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Loki](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/wyze/user_avatar/forums.wyze.com/loki/32/1595_2.png) [@Loki](https://forums.wyze.com/u/Loki)\
**Post date:** [January 4, 2019, 7:09pm UTC](https://forums.wyze.com/t/separate-ir-source/12640/14 "2019-01-04T19:09:16Z")

</div>

Just got this explanation from Wyze about why the Pan and V2 use different wavelength:

> The 850nm is easier for people to see the red light coming from the IR LEDs themselves and there were complaints that this made them harder to conceal for security reasons. In the Pan they put 940nm in, the lower wave length means less people have sensitive enough eyes to see the light so it is more concealable. A side effect of this was needing the additional 2 IRs to make up for the reduces power which is also why the Pan has 6 IRs instead of the 4 the V2 has.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![OverWatch](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/3bc359/32.png) [@OverWatch](https://forums.wyze.com/u/OverWatch)\
**Post date:** [January 4, 2019, 7:11pm UTC](https://forums.wyze.com/t/separate-ir-source/12640/15 "2019-01-04T19:11:34Z")

</div>

> [@Loki](#):
>
> In a totally dark room, I put a V2 in day mode (LEDs off), but pulled the filter out of the way with a magnet. Then I used the LEDs on a Pam to illuminate my face. The V2 was clearly sensitive to the 940nm light from the Pan. I did the same thing using a 2nd V2 for illumination. The V2 was equally sensitive to this light.

I’ll have to go back and find it, but before lunch I read the 940nm doesn’t illuminate as well s the 850nm. Not sure why. May be an efficiency thing like Ethanol doesn’t get as good of mileage as gasoline, so it takes more of it to go the same distance. More research on the trade-off for me to read.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![OverWatch](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/3bc359/32.png) [@OverWatch](https://forums.wyze.com/u/OverWatch)\
**Post date:** [January 4, 2019, 7:18pm UTC](https://forums.wyze.com/t/separate-ir-source/12640/16 "2019-01-04T19:18:24Z")

</div>

> [@Loki](#):
>
> In the Pan they put 940nm in, the lower wave length means less people have sensitive enough eyes to see the light so it is more concealable. A side effect of this was needing the additional 2 IRs to make up for the reduces power which is also why the Pan has 6 IRs instead of the 4 the V2 has.

And there’s Rick with the explanation.

So we know both wavelengths will work and the question becomes, does one attract bugs more than the other? And, will putting the light source some distance away from the camera cut down on the bug triggered false alarms?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Loki](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/wyze/user_avatar/forums.wyze.com/loki/32/1595_2.png) [@Loki](https://forums.wyze.com/u/Loki)\
**Post date:** [January 4, 2019, 7:19pm UTC](https://forums.wyze.com/t/separate-ir-source/12640/17 "2019-01-04T19:19:01Z")

</div>

I’m not an optics physicist, but my guess would be more absorption of that wavelength by the air molecules. Let us know what you learn.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![OverWatch](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/3bc359/32.png) [@OverWatch](https://forums.wyze.com/u/OverWatch)\
**Post date:** [January 4, 2019, 9:50pm UTC](https://forums.wyze.com/t/separate-ir-source/12640/18 "2019-01-04T21:50:00Z")

</div>

Well, [here is a study](https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Kentaro_Arikawa/publication/260683554_Physiological_basis_of_phototaxis_to_near-infrared_light_in_Nephotettix_cincticeps/links/56dd26e808aebabdb415a88b.pdf) where they used 940nm light to study insects reaction to light at shorter wavelengths.

> “In none of these previous studies was light of wavelengths \>700 nm used, probably because of the pre-conception that insects are blind in this wavelength region. However, as we have shown here, leafhoppers can indeed detect near IR light (~740 nm) and are clearly attracted to the light source. Consequently, near IR sensitivity may be found to be widespread among insects.”

I would think the longer the wavelength, the better, but there is certainly a trade-off as was seen in using the extra lamps in the Pan camera. Not to mention finding lower priced options with the 850nm vs 940nm lamps. As for the bug issue, I wonder if the 850nm is just enough to attract them to the source without having another alternative. It’s hard to believe, with the number of events overnight, these fly-bys are random. I may try using a standard LED nightlight as bait to draw any nearby bugs away from the camera, just as a test. In any case, putting the light source, 850nm or 940nm, some distance from the lens should help.

For anyone curious.

 ![image](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/wyze/original/2X/5/522451f7008a6880492d09a2a4a721787649f225.jpeg)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![rpitera](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/wyze/user_avatar/forums.wyze.com/rpitera/32/2175_2.png) [@rpitera](https://forums.wyze.com/u/rpitera)\
**Post date:** [January 8, 2019, 12:08am UTC](https://forums.wyze.com/t/separate-ir-source/12640/19 "2019-01-08T00:08:38Z")

</div>

Something I didn’t see mentioned here amongst all the cool science stuff - BTW, we have an impressive community of user, don’t we? - is that you should do some heavy reading of reviews and make sure that whatever IR source you buy has a quality power source. Cheap unregulated power supplies will dramatically decrease the life of IR LEDs. Took me two IR illuminator setups before I figured this out.

Everything looks great at first but over a few weeks to a few months, you’ll start to see a decrease and then LEDs will start to die off. Do some research before you buy!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![OverWatch](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/3bc359/32.png) [@OverWatch](https://forums.wyze.com/u/OverWatch)\
**Post date:** [January 8, 2019, 1:04am UTC](https://forums.wyze.com/t/separate-ir-source/12640/20 "2019-01-08T01:04:53Z")

</div>

I was surprised to see so many IR lamps sold without the power supply. I did see some reviews where people had used some that were probably under power for the lamps.

[Next page](https://forums.wyze.com/t/separate-ir-source/12640.md?page=2)
